PDA

View Full Version : Horay for nationalizing our companies



stalked_R/T
05-13-2009, 12:46 PM
Fuck this administration and everyone who voted for this clown.


U.S. Eyes Bank Pay Overhaul
Administration in Early Talks on Ways to Curb Compensation Across Finance

By DEBORAH SOLOMON and DAMIAN PALETTA

WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration has begun serious talks about how it can change compensation practices across the financial-services industry, including at companies that did not receive federal bailout money, according to people familiar with the matter.

The initiative, which is in its early stages, is part of an ambitious and likely controversial effort to broadly address the way financial companies pay employees and executives, including an attempt to more closely align pay with long-term performance.

Administration and regulatory officials are looking at various options, including using the Federal Reserve's supervisory powers, the power of the Securities and Exchange Commission and moral suasion. Officials are also looking at what could be done legislatively.

Among ideas being discussed are Fed rules that would curb banks' ability to pay employees in a way that would threaten the "safety and soundness" of the bank -- such as paying loan officers for the volume of business they do, not the quality. The administration is also discussing issuing "best practices" to guide firms in structuring pay.

At the same time, House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D., Mass.) is working on legislation that could strengthen the government's ability both to monitor compensation and to curb incentives that threaten a company's viability or pose a systemic risk to the economy.

It is unclear how such a bill would fit with what the Fed and others are already considering. But any legislation passed would make it harder for policy makers to dial back limits once the financial crisis subsides.

Any new compensation rules would likely be rolled out alongside a broader revamp of financial-markets regulation that the Treasury is pushing. The compensation effort is the latest example of the government's increasing focus on aspects of the financial sector that once were untouched.

Regulators have long had the power to sanction a bank for excessive pay structures, but have rarely used it. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency last year quietly pressed an unidentified large bank to make changes "pertaining to compensation incentives for bank personnel responsible for assigning risk ratings," a spokesman said. Since 2007, it has privately directed 15 banks to change their executive compensation practices.

Government officials said their effort, which is just beginning, isn't aimed at setting pay or establishing detailed rules. "This is not going to be about capping compensation or micro-management," said an administration official. "It will be about understanding what is the best way to align compensation with sound risk management and long-term value creation."

Despite the banking industry's weakened state, it would likely try to push back against curbs on how financial firms can compensate people. Bank executives have complained to federal officials that strict rules could prompt some of their best employees to move to parts of the financial industry that aren't regulated, such as hedge funds, private-equity firms and foreign banks. They've also argued that paying substantial bonuses is integral to how the industry works.

"Our companies have already enhanced, strengthened and expanded the number of compensation programs that are tied to long-term incentives," said Scott Talbott, a senior vice president at the Financial Services Roundtable, a trade group.

Edward Yingling, chief executive of the American Bankers Association, said banks might be able to accept new rules "as long as they are general in nature and could be enforced on a case-by-case basis. What would never work is detailed regulation of compensation."

President Barack Obama and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner have both blamed the way banks structured compensation plans for contributing to the financial mess. In February, Mr. Obama said executive pay helped lead to a "reckless culture and a quarter-by-quarter mentality that in turn helped to wreak havoc in our financial system."

Mr. Geithner recently instructed his staff to begin discussions with the Fed, the SEC and others about ways to address compensation practices.

During a recent congressional hearing, Chairman Ben Bernanke said the Fed was working on rules that will "ask or tell banks to structure their compensation, not just at the very top level but down much further, in a way that is consistent with safety and soundness -- which means that payments, bonuses and so on should be tied to performance and should not induce excessive risk."

In an indication of how broad the effort may become, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Sheila Bair said regulators need to examine compensation practices in the mortgage industry, suggesting new limits could stretch beyond banks.

"We need to make sure that incentives are aligned among all parties by making compensation contingent on the long-run performance of the underlying loans," Ms. Bair said on Tuesday.

The discussions follow a narrower effort by the administration to clip pay at firms that get federal aid. Earlier this year, it issued guidelines limiting salaries for top executives at firms that received funds under the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

Congress chimed in with even tougher rules curbing bonuses for top earners at the same firms, among other things. One rule bars firms receiving federal funds from paying top earners bonuses that equal more than a third of their total compensation.

The administration is still wrestling with how to marry those two efforts, which in combination are more punitive than officials intended. The Treasury is expected to issue new rules sometime in the next few weeks.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124215896684211987.html


i'm sure Uluz creamed his jeans at this thought.

Stinger1982
05-13-2009, 12:54 PM
sigh

i hate this guy, this isnt goiong to end well

wikdsvt
05-13-2009, 12:56 PM
Isn't it vividly clear what his agenda is?

Dr. Teeth
05-13-2009, 01:01 PM
Hrmmm. Controlling pay for workers, making them work harder for less, sanctioning those who work hard and make a decent living....

Sounds like health care and insurance companies. I remember when was downstate, my practice was busier than all hell, and I got AUDITTED by insurance companies because my practice did more work/billing than other practices in the area.

So I got singled out because I was successful. YAY!

DBK
05-13-2009, 01:01 PM
This story got emailed to me multiple times this morning. Sickening.

An explanation and example of SOCIALISM

An economics professor at Texas Tech said he had never failed a single student before but had, once, failed an entire class. That class had
insisted that socialism worked and that no one would be poor and no one would be rich, a great equalizer.

The professor then said ok, we will have an experiment in this class on socialism. All grades would be averaged and everyone would receive the same grade so no one would fail and no one would receive an A. After the first test the grades were averaged and everyone got a B. The students who studied hard were upset and the students who studied little were happy. But, as the second test rolled around, the students who studied little had studied even less and the ones who studied hard decided they wanted a free ride too; so they studied little. The second test average was a D. No one was happy. When the 3rd test rolled around the average was an F. The scores never increased as bickering, blame, name calling all resulted in hard feelings and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else.

All failed, to their great surprise, and the professor told them that socialism would also ultimately fail because when the reward is great, the
effort to succeed is great; but when government takes all the reward away; no one will try or want to succeed.

Could it be put any simpler than that....?

wikdsvt
05-13-2009, 01:08 PM
This story got emailed to me multiple times this morning. Sickening.

An explanation and example of SOCIALISM

An economics professor at Texas Tech said he had never failed a single student before but had, once, failed an entire class. That class had
insisted that socialism worked and that no one would be poor and no one would be rich, a great equalizer.

The professor then said ok, we will have an experiment in this class on socialism. All grades would be averaged and everyone would receive the same grade so no one would fail and no one would receive an A. After the first test the grades were averaged and everyone got a B. The students who studied hard were upset and the students who studied little were happy. But, as the second test rolled around, the students who studied little had studied even less and the ones who studied hard decided they wanted a free ride too; so they studied little. The second test average was a D. No one was happy. When the 3rd test rolled around the average was an F. The scores never increased as bickering, blame, name calling all resulted in hard feelings and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else.

All failed, to their great surprise, and the professor told them that socialism would also ultimately fail because when the reward is great, the
effort to succeed is great; but when government takes all the reward away; no one will try or want to succeed.

Could it be put any simpler than that....?



See it's vividly clear!

patman
05-13-2009, 02:10 PM
Sounds like socialism to me. Libs, what's your take on this?

jsxtreme
05-13-2009, 02:23 PM
Sounds like socialism to me. Libs, what's your spin on this?

Corrected and who gives a shit. They'll blow him no matter what. It's disgusting.

So this is how freedom dies?

patman
05-13-2009, 02:26 PM
Corrected and who gives a shit. They'll blow him no matter what. It's disgusting.

So this is how freedom dies?

But the real question is do they swallow?

jsxtreme
05-13-2009, 02:27 PM
I'm convinced they go ATM.

Dr. Teeth
05-13-2009, 02:33 PM
Now all we need to do is to find a way to have Airplanes, Trains, and Heavy Equipment made there and we can be a totally WORTHLESS country from industry. Soon all we'll make here is Medicaid babies, and police reports.

cjmatt
05-13-2009, 03:41 PM
If only we could clone JWB
http://www.northville.k12.mi.us/nhs/HistoryPage/00010757.jpg

wide winger
05-13-2009, 03:56 PM
This is what the fools voted for a sham like none other and they have just started his second 100 days in office.
We are in serious trouble as a free nation!

Our forefathers would be fit to be tied if they saw what a second rate nation we are becoming....... all for the good of those who refuse to participate in the American way of life.

:gr_patrio

91Notch
05-14-2009, 09:54 PM
Fuck this administration and everyone who voted for this clown.

:thumbsup:

TTA
05-14-2009, 10:16 PM
Isn't it vividly clear what his agenda is?

USSA?

TTA
05-14-2009, 10:20 PM
So this is how freedom dies?

Not with a bang but a whimper.

jtproudmarinedad
05-14-2009, 10:30 PM
Here's a couple emails!!
email these clowns and tell them what you think

senator@stabenow.senate.gov
senator_levin@levin.senate.gov
its senator_levin

91Notch
05-14-2009, 11:18 PM
Here's a couple emails!!
email these clowns and tell them what you think

senator@stabenow.senate.gov
senator_levin@levin.senate.gov
its senator_levin

I think they should both resign

jtproudmarinedad
05-14-2009, 11:24 PM
I think they should both resign

X2 but they are our elected officials for the state so if enough people email and bitch they do hear it, I have been emailing them for a while on various issues. LOL
JT

Joe
05-15-2009, 08:16 AM
Here's a couple emails!!
email these clowns and tell them what you think

senator@stabenow.senate.gov
senator_levin@levin.senate.gov
its senator_levin

I forwarded that article to them. +1

jsxtreme
05-16-2009, 02:31 AM
Awful quiet in this thread from a certain group of people.

4Gas$
05-16-2009, 08:13 AM
Awful quiet in this thread from a certain group of people.

Why would "those people" chime in & say anything?
It's their King thats in charge, our "Comrades" have
what they fought for, waited so long for.

The enemy isn’t overseas, he’s living next door.

Sleeper
05-18-2009, 01:57 PM
fortunately that whole article is solely about banks, who we all know are pretty corrupt anyway.

igotaneed4speed
05-18-2009, 02:14 PM
Whens the revolution gunna start that I've been saying for the past two years was coming?

Freedom? Whats that we havn't had freedom in ages. They slowly take over a lil more and more and everyone just taks saying ohh yeah no need for lube just plug away thanks.