PDA

View Full Version : Major Destruction of Workers Rights at NLRB Today


uluz2a6
10-06-2006, 11:30 AM
The National Labor Relations Board ruled today that a range of professionals are now deemed "supervisors" and thus lose all protections under labor law. That means if they say a positive thing about unions, their bosses are free to fire them at will.

To put this denial of labor rights in perspective, 32 million workers or 25% of the workforce already have no right to form a union under federal, state or local law

This includes:

Supervisors 16.6 million workers, 8 million new supervisors plus traditional 8.6 million now excluded (see EPI report)
Agricultural Workers 3 million workers
Domestic Workers 1 million workers
Independent Contractors 7 million workers
Managers 10 million workers
Employees of religious institutions 500,000 workers

Additionally, millions of public employees are excluded from labor law protections and depend on state law for whether they have any labor rights.

This report by Hon. George Miller of Committee on Education and Workforce on NLRB stripping workers of rights, including denying organizing rights to disabled workers, graduate teaching assistants, and many temporary workers.

But beyond the statistics of who CAN'T be organized, these kinds of exclusions means that other workers rights are also undermined. The fact that independent contractors can't unionize means that many firms can contract out work to block or undermine unionization.

And the new expansive definition of "supervisor" means that more workers will be given nominal supervisory responsibilities to undermine their right to unionize-- and lock every union vote in endless delays as companies litigate who is and who is not a supervisor. Even if the workers "win", the election will probably be delayed long enough to kill the union drive.

And here are the dynamics when large numbers of workers are declared to be supervisors-- it means that friends in the workplace immediately are turned into enemies as supervisors are told to spy on their friends or lose their jobs. Instead of a union being about workers challenging the power of top management, it is turned into an internal workplace civil war.

But divide and conquer, pitting people against each other based on race, ethnicity, gender and now menial distinctions in authority on the shopfloor are the tools of the trade for the corporate rightwing. This decision is just one more bullet to the rights of working Americans.

RedXtcy
10-06-2006, 11:36 AM
its bush's fault

cASe SenSiTive
10-06-2006, 11:42 AM
its bush's fault


I blame the Whigs. :dontknow:

stalked_R/T
10-06-2006, 11:43 AM
I thought it was one of the Roses that we are supposed to blame.

patman
10-06-2006, 01:07 PM
I'm a supervisor and I'm not protected by a union, but I'm not worried though...I work for a living.....:icon_mrgr

patman

Fryguy302
10-06-2006, 01:25 PM
Good. Fuck the unions.

91trunk
10-06-2006, 01:57 PM
Good. Fuck the unions.

Whooooooooaaaaaa.

That's pretty harsh. I say the Unions need to rethink alot of things. Unions are helpful when it comes to certain labor areas. They need to stop protecting the lazy fucks though.

ReiKo
10-06-2006, 02:03 PM
Good. Fuck the unions.
x2

Line Noise
10-06-2006, 02:05 PM
x2

X3

dpmcghee
10-06-2006, 03:47 PM
This includes:

Employees of religious institutions 500,000 workers

[/U][/B]


Exactly...that's right, I'm included in the list. And you don't hear us (me) crying about it either, do you?



Dan

RedXtcy
10-06-2006, 03:50 PM
X3
x4

DBK
10-06-2006, 04:26 PM
x4
x5

patman
10-06-2006, 05:08 PM
Isn't it about time for uluz to post a "funny yet sacastic" cut and paste cartoon?:dontknow:

patman

91Notch
10-06-2006, 05:09 PM
I'm a supervisor and I'm not protected by a union, but I'm not worried though...I work for a living.....:icon_mrgr

patman

:ohsnap:

Pure84GTT
10-06-2006, 06:05 PM
:jerry:



unions are a good idea but they have become saturated with lazy people that protect there lazy friends

198950lx
10-06-2006, 08:27 PM
I agree with this 100% But unfortunately, the union(s) have a lot of lazy fucks that give the good union folks a bad name, IMO.

Whooooooooaaaaaa.

That's pretty harsh. I say the Unions need to rethink alot of things. Unions are helpful when it comes to certain labor areas. They need to stop protecting the lazy fucks though.

L98Terror
10-06-2006, 08:32 PM
:jerry:



unions are a good idea but they have become saturated with lazy people that protect there lazy friends
:badass:


If you are a good worker you don't need protection, only lazy dumb asses need unions

Roadrage
10-06-2006, 09:45 PM
Good. Fuck the unions.

x however many we are up to.

CableGuy
10-06-2006, 10:51 PM
In 20 years it will be the rich and the poor, just the way they want it.