Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: Wait... could this be legit? V10 Challenger?

  1. #11
    Forum Member OnyxSSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    3,616

    Default

    it would get awsome milage

  2. #12
    Club Member DetroitStyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Posting WHATEVER THE FUCK I WANT in the Pub
    Posts
    15,826

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moneypit View Post
    it would never pass crash testing
    Neither did your skull. But we still let you hang around.
    1994 Yamaha YZF-750R / 1993 Honda CBR900RR / 1991 Kawasaki ZX-7 / 1992 Kawasaki ZX-7R / 1993 Kawasaki ZX-7 / 1989 Suzuki GSXR-750

  3. #13
    Club Member moneypit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    sony guts
    Posts
    22,597

    Default

    its only a small crack
    To me, it's a good idea to always carry two sacks of something when you walk around. That way, if anybody says, "Hey, can you give me a hand?" You can say, "Sorry, got these sacks."

  4. #14
    Club Member dpmcghee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    5,625

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OnyxSSS View Post
    it would get awsome milage
    Who cares what kind of mileage it would get. Its an awesome concept and would destroy the Camaro. The body style is great to begin with, its just that they are slug slow, especially compared to the newest Mustang. With that engine that would all change.

  5. #15
    Forum Member 89five.o's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Columbus, IN
    Posts
    3,230

    Default

    They put the engine in everything else, doesn't seem far fetched to me. Out of the Mustang,Camaro,Charger,and Challenger the Challenger is still by far the best looking on the outside IMO. Last time I drove one the interior was pretty boring though and other than being a sweet cruiser I think it's too heavy for anything performance-wise.

  6. #16
    Club Member cjmatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    your mom
    Posts
    15,088

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dpmcghee View Post
    Who cares what kind of mileage it would get. Its an awesome concept and would destroy the Camaro. The body style is great to begin with, its just that they are slug slow, especially compared to the newest Mustang. With that engine that would all change.
    except for the fact that the car already costs 43k with the run of mill truck motor. not the super low production V10. Itd prob sticker close to 70k
    Matt -
    2010 Boost Logic GT-R
    1983 Ford Fairmont

  7. #17
    Club Member Duke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Southgate
    Posts
    3,315

    Default

    It's a V10. If it's the exact car I think it is then Scott K. (Scoot) was on that project for those of you who know him. I remember seeing it, I think it was at CTC...Anyway I remember everyone complaining about how badly everyhting fit together on that car.
    I like pie.

  8. #18
    Resident Mouth 388Monte's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    The Shores
    Posts
    12,912

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Duke View Post
    It's a V10. If it's the exact car I think it is then Scott K. (Scoot) was on that project for those of you who know him. I remember seeing it, I think it was at CTC...Anyway I remember everyone complaining about how badly everyhting fit together on that car.
    I think it is the same car scott worked on . . . I remember him telling me about that project.
    "Swagg-10"

    "Dirty Brown"

    TEAM B RACING



  9. #19
    Club Member Joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Rochester Hills
    Posts
    15,146

    Default

    Nice looking ride. Looks better than most test cars
    MichiganClassics.com - Muscle & Classic car resource - Event listings - Classifieds

    2000 GMC Sierra Z71 - 200K mile DD - Very green, runs on recycled dinosaurs
    1967 Camaro RS/SS L78 - Perpetual project
    Hot Rod Search Google searches for gearheads!
    My stuff on eBay

  10. #20
    Club Member sardeanie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Watertucky
    Posts
    4,382

    Default

    The v-10 sound would be completely out of place in that car compared to the bellow of the current 6.1. If performance is what they want put in the 392. Don't get me wrong, the v-10 is a sweet engine.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •