I see what you are saying - and I am definitely one of the people who thought it was a good trade. Not because Stafford sucks, because the Lion's have such an utter lack of talent on the team that keeping Staff would be a waste when you can convert him into high draft picks.
As much as you argue against him being Pad Statford, though, unless he wins the Super Bowl, you are going to cement him as Pad Statford. It is pulling off big wins that cements a QB as legendary. Pulling out a win to make the Lions 0-7 hardly qualifies in that respect. And looking at how many times the Lions flat out embarrassed the Rams - two successful fake punts, onside kick recovery, screen pass for a touchdown - I think LA has a lot of work to do if they want to compete at a playoff level against a REAL team (Stafford is 1-1 remember?). Stafford is unproven in that respect.
Stafford had a good game, but he was helped by a phantom pass interference call to keep one of the early scoring drives alive. He did make the drives at the end that counted though. I remember like five or six years ago, Stafford had a talent for pulling off close games. So maybe he has it in him? But saying he does just because he can look like a rock-star against the Lion's is a stretch.
-Geoff
Bookmarks