Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: 3rd Gen Torque arms

  1. #11
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Having Fun
    Posts
    1,133

    Default

    that exhaust is sweet much staighter than some of the y pipes out there...very nice who makes it???

  2. #12
    Club Member Braile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    447

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Duke View Post
    Dan I have that exact trans crossmember you have, actually I have the prototype My exhaust system is alomst identical!

    Ok so What system is it? No I have not seen it before. who makes it, I was planning on ordering the S&W one. But it is on Back order for another week or so.
    Fred
    04' Escalade ESV
    98' Cobra LSX
    91' Camaro RS convertible
    78' Trans am

  3. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by QUASAR View Post
    Did jegs just come out with that one? That looks interesting. I'd like to see a closeup of the bracket/slider. It needs to actually decouple to change the instant center for braking.
    It also looks interesting up-close

    ____________________________________

    My Truck Accessories

  4. #14
    Club Member sonic z's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    S.C.S.
    Posts
    2,180

    Default

    I use Spohn torque arm and BMR extreme anti-roll bar.Spohn everything else.1.4 60ft.I think It works.


    Last edited by sonic z; 03-28-2008 at 05:05 AM.
    1983 Z28, old 406 engine SOLD!! New SBC,in the car and running strong!Baby steps...

  5. #15
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Braile View Post
    Ok so What system is it? No I have not seen it before. who makes it, I was planning on ordering the S&W one. But it is on Back order for another week or so.
    http://www.unbalancedengineering.com

    Jason Swindle made the torque arm, and I adapted it to the third-gen chassis.

    I also have one of Andris's prototype crossmembers (http://www.skulte.com) for the T56 and long tube headers. It's what enabled me to create that straight exhaust with over 3.5" of ground clearance. Sorry, but the Y-pipe is hand-fabricated, then was ceramic coated at http://www.zoofactorycoatings.com in Kalamazoo, MI.


  6. #16
    Club Member Duke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Southgate
    Posts
    3,315

    Default

    Good idea having it ceramic coated Dan, I might do the same thing. I'll go take a pic of my Y pipe right now...
    I like pie.

  7. #17
    Club Member Duke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Southgate
    Posts
    3,315

    Default

    I like pie.

  8. #18
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    37

    Default

    See? There ya go! With a chop saw, a three-inch cutoff wheel and a MIG, anything is possible. Our Y-pipes look pretty much similar. IIRC, mine took about twelve leisurely hours to fabricate, and cost about $100 to make, plus $110 to ceramic coat.

    However we're straying from the thread, aren't we?

    FWIW, it's my opinion that the choice of the ultimate torque arm design is probably going be determined by the principal application. A shortie BMR/Madman design that employs a crossmember will lend itself to drag racing really well, but will sacrifice braking performance in autocross/road course applications. Steve Spohn's torque arms are highly bullet resistant, stout pieces, and you can't really go wrong with it. However my personal experience is that Spohn torque arms tend to get noisy and bang around under there on the street. (I've purchased and used two of them on my car).

    If I were to have an automatic transmission again, I'd probably go back to a lightweight, adjustable torque arm that fits into a polyurethane bushing on the tailshaft. It's cheap, stiff, and light weight.
    ---
    Sean, I can't really figure out how the Mcpherson strut arrangement of a thirdgen versus fourthgen makes a difference in terms of wheelhop under braking though-- I'd need to get my head around some math to become convinced of that.
    ---
    The torque arm solution I settled on is certainly not for the faint of heart as it required some intermediate skills with fabrication: I had to install steel tubing into the floorpan to strengthen it, fabricate brackets, recontour the transmmission tunnel, and even cut & widen it a few inches down in the rear seat area. It was also expensive, and I still haven't fully sorted it out for ultimate traction. It does great on the road course, and seems to hook on the drag strip, but I kept bogging the engine on the launch and never managed a 60-foot better than 1.88 seconds.

  9. #19
    Club Member TWOBEERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Roseville
    Posts
    735

    Default

    Do you have any pics? I'm currently working on my gen3. I'm running a SBC with a T400, and a moser 9". My intentions are to set it up to Autocross, some recreational Road course, and Drag Race. So far I've made my own adjustable Panhard, Relocation brkts, and boxed the control arms. I'm contemplating what I want/need from the Torque arm, and what design, or combination of, that I want to make.

  10. #20
    Club Sponsor
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    W-town
    Posts
    5,210

    Default

    Look at the way the 4th gen puts wieght on the strut and the upper and lower ball joint angle in a 3rd vs 4th gen. the SLA front suepsnion lends itself to dive gvien its geometery. Third gens are also over 100lbs lighter on the nose.


    Quote Originally Posted by ws6transam View Post
    See? There ya go! With a chop saw, a three-inch cutoff wheel and a MIG, anything is possible. Our Y-pipes look pretty much similar. IIRC, mine took about twelve leisurely hours to fabricate, and cost about $100 to make, plus $110 to ceramic coat.

    However we're straying from the thread, aren't we?

    FWIW, it's my opinion that the choice of the ultimate torque arm design is probably going be determined by the principal application. A shortie BMR/Madman design that employs a crossmember will lend itself to drag racing really well, but will sacrifice braking performance in autocross/road course applications. Steve Spohn's torque arms are highly bullet resistant, stout pieces, and you can't really go wrong with it. However my personal experience is that Spohn torque arms tend to get noisy and bang around under there on the street. (I've purchased and used two of them on my car).

    If I were to have an automatic transmission again, I'd probably go back to a lightweight, adjustable torque arm that fits into a polyurethane bushing on the tailshaft. It's cheap, stiff, and light weight.
    ---
    Sean, I can't really figure out how the Mcpherson strut arrangement of a thirdgen versus fourthgen makes a difference in terms of wheelhop under braking though-- I'd need to get my head around some math to become convinced of that.
    ---
    The torque arm solution I settled on is certainly not for the faint of heart as it required some intermediate skills with fabrication: I had to install steel tubing into the floorpan to strengthen it, fabricate brackets, recontour the transmmission tunnel, and even cut & widen it a few inches down in the rear seat area. It was also expensive, and I still haven't fully sorted it out for ultimate traction. It does great on the road course, and seems to hook on the drag strip, but I kept bogging the engine on the launch and never managed a 60-foot better than 1.88 seconds.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •