I agree with you, and I realize that large vehicles are the way of the future. I also realize that they're making giant cars go fast, and that's great. I just find it
extremely disappointing. I drove a new V6 Camaro, and I don't understand the vehicle whatsoever. Looks aside, I don't think it offers really anything. But for the sake of getting my point across, I'm the guy that will buy a Miata before a Corvette. I used to drive a little old BMW that was lowered. I'll never forget the first time a new Taurus pulled up next to me. The side mirror was above my head. I could not believe how massive it was.
I will still continue to believe that the weight is a disadvantage. I believe the reason for the performance has much to do with chassis technology in new cars. Having owned a '97 civc, and now a 2002 Si (the hatchback one), the '02 feels much, much bigger. I don't like that part, however, it feels as though it handles MUCH better than the previous generations. According to Wikipedia, it has Which is great and all, however it also added an additional 150lbs, which is VERY noticeable considering it
still has 160hp.
I think the key is to just make the damn things smaller.
Continue developing new chassis/suspension technology, but just reduce the size. Take the new Viper for example. It's nearly 200lb lighter than the previous model, as well as having more power. The current Camaro is nearly 350lb heavier than the previous generation. So some of the increased power over the last generation gets cancelled out.
My issue is not that any of these cars have poor performance. But my question is this - why put in all the time and effort making a large car perform when you don't have to? Why not start with something that will guarantee success with less effort? Perhaps I just see things much differently than most. :/
And for the record, I'm not trying to start a fight.
I am sincere when I say that I just don't get it.
Bookmarks