Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 72

Thread: UAW Contract Expiration

  1. #41

    Default

    I am not part of the UAW, but I feel for the workers. That Fain guy strikes me to be a fuckin weasel.

  2. #42
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,745

    Default

    Hilarious Fain is ripping on CEO pay when he's making $350k+/year with no skin the game other than being a front man for labor.

  3. #43

  4. #44
    Club Member YLWFVR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Shelby Twp
    Posts
    10,945

    Default

    Are UAW employees not allowed to own stock in the big 3?

  5. #45
    Club Member WhiteHawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Metro Detroit, MI
    Posts
    15,542

    Default

    GM announced that the strike cost them $800 million so far. That is $1000 less yearly bonus per UAW member based on the current bonus plan. Every billion they lose is another $1000 out of members pockets. For no reason that I can tell either - they seem to have a great offer on the table but Fain doesn't seem to want to settle.

    -Geoff
    2023 Camaro Convertible 2SS

  6. #46
    Club Member wrath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Chelsea, MI
    Posts
    953

    Default

    Which would you choose... 1,000 now or 10,000 a year in perpetuity starting next contract?

  7. #47
    Club Member WhiteHawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Metro Detroit, MI
    Posts
    15,542

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wrath View Post
    Which would you choose... 1,000 now or 10,000 a year in perpetuity starting next contract?
    I am not really sure how your math works. You are saying they are going to get another $10,000 on top of what is on the table now? So the math you are saying is $40k over the next four years on top of the current offer. That is roughly $10k a year, or around $4.81 an hour. To get that, the starting return to work pay would have to be roughly a 25% bump instead of the 10% being offered now. Not saying it is impossible, but it seems like a stretch.

    Let's do some more math:

    - On strike they get $500 a week. If they normally make $32 an hour (I am ballparking, I think it is like $32 something so my number will be a bit low). Working 40 hours, that is $1280 a week. So they are losing $780 a week by being on strike.
    - If they approved the contract, they would get an instant 10% bump, so that $780 a week is really $858 that they aren't making. Because if they went back today, they would get the 10% instantly according to the offer.
    - Every month the strike continues, they make $858 x 4 less, or $3432 a month.
    - Three months on strike, and that $10,000 signing bonus that is sitting on the table right now isn't even breaking even (and we are half way there already for a lot of workers).
    - If you put them at 48 hours, which is quite common, it starts getting even more ridiculous. That adds 8 hours x $48 an hour $384 a week, or $1536 a month. That means a striking worker is missing out on $4968 a month!
    - Add in the lost profit sharing of $1000 a month, and the average UAW worker is losing $5968 a month.

    That's just math. Congrats to Fain on the long strike. He's still getting paid though, while the hard working guys on the line are losing six grand a month. I hope they get a great offer, but I am not sure they are going to do good enough incrementally here to ever make up for Fain's ego.

    -Geoff
    Last edited by WhiteHawk; 10-24-2023 at 01:15 PM.
    2023 Camaro Convertible 2SS

  8. #48
    Club Member capone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Clinton Township, MI
    Posts
    2,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WhiteHawk View Post
    I am not really sure how your math works. You are saying they are going to get another $10,000 on top of what is on the table now? So the math you are saying is $40k over the next four years on top of the current offer. That is roughly $10k a year, or around $4.81 an hour. To get that, the starting return to work pay would have to be roughly a 25% bump instead of the 10% being offered now. Not saying it is impossible, but it seems like a stretch.

    Let's do some more math:

    - On strike they get $500 a week. If they normally make $32 an hour (I am ballparking, I think it is like $32 something so my number will be a bit low). Working 40 hours, that is $1280 a week. So they are losing $780 a week by being on strike.
    - If they approved the contract, they would get an instant 10% bump, so that $780 a week is really $858 that they aren't making. Because if they went back today, they would get the 10% instantly according to the offer.
    - Every month the strike continues, they make $858 x 4 less, or $3432 a month.
    - Three months on strike, and that $10,000 signing bonus that is sitting on the table right now isn't even breaking even (and we are half way there already for a lot of workers).
    - If you put them at 48 hours, which is quite common, it starts getting even more ridiculous. That adds 8 hours x $48 an hour $384 a week, or $1536 a month. That means a striking worker is missing out on $4968 a month!
    - Add in the lost profit sharing of $1000 a month, and the average UAW worker is losing $5968 a month.

    That's just math. Congrats to Fain on the long strike. He's still getting paid though, while the hard working guys on the line are losing six grand a month. I hope they get a great offer, but I am not sure they are going to do good enough incrementally here to ever make up for Fain's ego.

    -Geoff
    I am a UAW employee and completely agree with what you wrote. I like what my company has publicly offered but I do not know what the real negatives are because Fain hasn't said. I'm sure it has something to do with job security and the use of TPT workers. I wish he would elaborate though.

  9. #49
    Club Member WhiteHawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Metro Detroit, MI
    Posts
    15,542

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by capone View Post
    I am a UAW employee and completely agree with what you wrote. I like what my company has publicly offered but I do not know what the real negatives are because Fain hasn't said. I'm sure it has something to do with job security and the use of TPT workers. I wish he would elaborate though.
    I think it is not just you, it is the Big 3 CEO's too, wondering what it will take.

    My guess is that he is still fighting tiers. I think the OEM's should just give in on them. They went 80 years or whatever without them. If you do the math (which I love doing), the amount the tiers save is really small. If like 20% of your workforce is on a lower tier, and they make 10% less on average (it goes from 20% to 0%), it is literally like a 2% labor savings. When you are offering 25% total, just offer 23% and get rid of tiers. Same cost!

    But yea, shutting down the big money plants hurts everybody, not just the CEOs. Nothing to do but sit and wait I guess.

    -Geoff
    2023 Camaro Convertible 2SS

  10. #50
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    4,873

    Default

    If Fain was making $500 a week this strike would have ended by now. I know quite a few couples where both husband/wife or boyfriend/girlfriend are picketing together. Families are suffering and Fain is getting his money.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •